FxPro Raw+ Account [Pakistan]
The FxPro Raw+ account: raw spreads from 0.0 pips plus a commission, built for active traders and scalpers.
Open FxPro Account →Order size is the one variable this account does not price. The Raw+ commission is charged at $3.50 per lot per side, so a ticket costs precisely what its lot count says and that rate neither improves nor worsens as the ticket grows. According to FxPro, Raw+ shows spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs and carries the cost in that commission line rather than in a wider spread, while the Standard account has no separate commission but wider all-in spreads. What size does reach is the fill: our execution test sent real market orders on the Raw+ feed at three different order sizes and reports each of them on its own row, so you can see where the fill matched the click and where the two parted company, instead of reading one blended average. Raw+ runs on MetaTrader 4, and a similar raw-pricing model is available on cTrader.
What Raw+ actually delivers (measured)
What the Raw+ account actually delivered when we measured it on FxPro’s own MT5 feed:
- EUR/USD measured at a 0.2-pip median spread and about $9.00 all-in per standard lot.
- That breaks even in 0.9 pips, and the spread measured perfectly stable (stability ratio 1) — tight and steady enough to scalp.
- Across the majors the measured spread sat at or below an independent interbank reference feed (EUR/USD +0.18, AUD/USD +0.04, USD/CAD −0.4 pips).
- Market orders in our test filled in about 78 to 99 milliseconds with near-zero slippage and no rejects.
- Raw+ commission is tiered by order size, with a minimum on the smallest size:
| Order size | Commission (Raw+) |
|---|---|
| 0.01 lot | $4.00 per side |
| 0.1 lot | $3.50 per side |
| 1.0 lot | $3.50 per side |
First-hand from the live feed — full detail on our measured spreads and execution pages.
FxPro Raw+ at a glance
- Raw spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs
- Commission of $3.50 per lot per side
- Built for frequent traders and scalpers
- Runs on MetaTrader 4 (cTrader offers a similar raw model)
- Contrasts with the Standard all-in-spread account
What the measured fills did as size went up
The execution test placed real market orders on the Raw+ account at three different sizes and timed each one, and the results are kept separate by size on purpose. A single blended average would answer the wrong question: what a scaling trader needs to know is not the mean fill across everything, but whether the numbers on the largest tested row look like the numbers on the smallest one.
Read that way, the table says two things. Speeds sat in the same narrow band at every tested size, and slippage was the exception rather than the rule — it appeared on one pair, at the top of the tested range, and not below it. The sample is small by design, three round trips per size on a demo Raw+ feed, so it is a shape rather than a promise. The full table sits on our trading conditions page.
Where a position stops being one order
Size on this account is bounded and quantised: a 0.01-lot floor, 0.01-lot steps and a 500-lot ceiling for a single order, with 100,000 units of an FX major behind each standard lot. Between the floor and the ceiling an intended position always lands on the nearest step, which on a large ticket is a real amount of exposure rather than a rounding detail.
Above the ceiling the position changes character. One ticket receives one price; a sequence of tickets receives several, and the terminal shows their weighted average as the open price of the position. That average is what every later result is measured against, so it belongs in the plan before the first ticket rather than in the review afterwards.
The size band this was actually tested at
Everything on this page about behaviour rather than pricing comes from three order sizes, three round trips each, on FxPro's own demo Raw+ feed. Within that band the readings are consistent: speeds clustered together, no failures, and slippage that showed up on one pair at one size. The largest size in the test is a long way below the 500-lot ceiling the specification allows.
Outside the tested band there is nothing to report, and saying so is more useful than extrapolating. A trader whose usual ticket is far larger than the top of that band should treat the table as evidence about the account's pricing model — a fixed rate per lot per side, no size tiers — rather than as evidence about the fills their own size will receive.
Frequently asked questions
Does the Raw+ commission get better on a larger ticket?
How did Raw+ fills behave as the order size went up?
Were there rejects or unfilled orders at the larger sizes?
What is the largest single order Raw+ allows?
What happens to a position that needs more than the 500-lot ceiling?
Does the 0.01-lot step matter on a large position?
What traders report
Six reviewers, and the argument between them is really about which account to be on. Three make the case for paying a fixed $3.50 per side to get near-zero spreads, one adding that the raw pricing looked built for forex majors, while a longer-timeframe trader says spread width has never affected him and he stays on Standard. Two push back for different reasons, one wanting the spreads lower before he gives a full five and the other reporting that the mobile app keeps losing his drawings and indicators, so cost and tooling are separate complaints here.
I gotta agree with the opinion that commission based trading is better for lower timeframe trading styles.Fxpro is not only provides zero spread accounts, but also charges only $3.5 per side-B)
For me a Standard account is the best with this brocker. I mostly trade on H4-D and even W timeframes. Therefore, for me spreads or to be exact, how wide they are, has never been important. I didn’t test it cuz I trust my friend’s feedback. It was a good tip and I already benefit from the broker.
Solid option for forex traders. 0 spreads on a raw account, plus a not expensive $3.5 fee, wasn’t bad at all, for my wallet. Seemed to be exclusive for forex, luck for me, cuz I trade only majors.
Wow, time flies. 💸 I just got a notification from FxPro that I hit 100 trades, and it was like yesterday when I started trading on this platform. If you reduce the spreads, I’ll give you 5 stars 😂
FxPro’s spreads and execution have been favourable for my trading strategy. :P
It is good. free version, some of the spreads are too high. And in apps to are very difficult to use. It's not user-friendly. what you draw in charts and indicators disappear from time to time. please fix it.